There have been numerous myths, mysteries and conspiracies dating from the dawn of the civilization to the advanced world of the 21st century. Some rise from the social beliefs or imaginary stories carried ahead on to centuries while others are substantiated sometimes either by the imperfect ruins of past or factual evidences that are surrounded by suspicion.
So let us take a look at some of the most famous Orion controversies, where doubts supersede the specified proofs and the real answers still remain buried as the darkest truths of the history.
Lunar Mission
When Apolo11 became the first manned mission to land on Moon in 1969, the world rejoiced this first successful endeavor with high spirits. However soon this happiness was surrounded by hoax claims that advocated the belief that, Moon landing was never accomplished or was publicized in a different way than it had actually happened. According to the proponents, the mission had been faked in a Hollywood studio using camera tricks. The various questionable aspects listed as the waving flag in an airless atmosphere, footprints, different angles and shades of shadows inspite of one source of light, no stars and so on. Adding to the fears were the reported deaths of the key Apollo personnel and also the missing telemetry data tapes. NASA and American government together laid down a plethora of evidences to negate the faulty assertions. But moon landing still remains under the clouds of doubts for some investigators. ( Image Source )
Terre Creuse or the Theory of the Hollow World
This refers to the belief of various theorists who propagate that the earth is a hollow sphere and has an internal surface area. The scientific community does not shore up the theories however many supporters did roll out their hypothesis over the hollow earth. These date back to the ancient mythologies depicting the underworld with the others in the 17th and the 20th century pointing to concentric shells or a central core. Later the theory of concave hollow Earth was also advocated. All these suppositions contradicted with the Newton’s law of gravitational pull and it still remains under qualm as what lies deep inside the planet earth. ( Image Source )
The Archeological cover-ups
This conspiracy revolves around archaeological institute in the United States, the Smithsonian Institute and the existence of the races of giant humans. The archeological cover-up investigators charge the institute for suppressing the most important discoveries made in America. It is believed that John Wesley Powell, the geologist famous for exploring the Grand Canyon, appointed Cyrus Thomas as the director of the Eastern Mound Division of the Smithsonian Institution’s Bureau of Ethnology. The Institute began to suppress the evidences that revealed the dissemination of culture and civilization via contact by ships, trades and voyages. Also a number of remains of huge skeletons and bones of massive humans that were too enormous than the normal size were excavated but later found missing in the records. Read here for more. ( Image Source )
Vimana
India has always been known as land of stories and mysteries. The word Vimana has been talked about a lot in Indian mythology. This Sanskrit word derives its meaning from vi- = “apart” and mā-na- = “having been measured”. Ancient stories basically talk about four Vimanas and they are Shakuna Vimana, the Sundara Vimana, the Rukma Vimana and the Tripura Vimana. Used by deities to travel this world and other, Vimana have huge significance in the vedic literature. ( Image Source )
Nazi UFOs
Viktor Schauberger who is called the father of Nazi UFO was the mind behind the group “Vril. The group was involved in developing anti gravity systems with the help of leading German scientists. Schauberger also worked under the protection of US government and tried to improve their flying saucers. On the flying saucers: 70% of so-called unidentified flying objects are built and people have nothing to do with aliens. These developments are carried out with utmost secrecy. ( Image Source )
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Hen That Adopted Little Kittens
A Guy From China That Is Not Afraid Of Death
Sea Creatures Made From Wool
Espresso Royale: A Coffeehouse With The Coolest Descriptions
Beautiful Horse Statues Made From Old Wood
Avengers Sculptures Made By Gluing Avengers Toys
Cookies For Fans Of Legend Of Zelda And Space Invaders Games
Wall Decoration That Will Scare Everyone
One Of The Biggest Bubblegum Balloon That You Will Ever See
Creepy Hot Dog Stand That Looks Like A Coffin
I really do believe there are UFOs.
http://www.myspace.com/nopenamu
Wow, thats one wacky owl dude.
Lou
Way to pick me up then let me down. Thanks for just listing some conspiracies and not delving into any detail.
You are really sad.
PLEASE TRASLATE TO ARABIC
THANKS
It’s hard to believe that over 41 years later, some people still question the moon landings, especially the first one.
First, the bit about the motion of the flag. Don’t the deniers observe the concept of momentum in their everyday lives? To you who deny, what happens on a perfectly windless day and you’re driving along at 60mph on a perfectly flat service and you take your foot off the accelerator? Does your vehicle instantly stop? No? Why not? There’s no wind to keep pushing it along, nor downhill slope so gravity can keep pulling you down, so just WHY doesn’t your vehicle stop in that one quintillionth of a second after you take your foot off the pedal? It’s MOMENTUM. Same thing on the Moon, especially given the virtual vacuum there. Don’t you think if you threw a rock on the Moon it would keep going until a combination of its energy loss plus the tug of lunar gravity pulled back to the surface and it bounced and rolled to a stop? Well, the flag did exactly the same thing — ESPECIALLY in the absence of air to slow such a lightweight thing down sooner. This isn’t celestial mechanics.
Next up is the absence of stars. Tell you what. One clear, Moonless evening, once it’s good and dark, take a camera and go to a really brightly-lit parking lot with a surface made of light cement or concrete. Set the shutter speed so that the exposure is correct for the parkit lot. Now — see, say, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn — the four brightest planets — over there within your camera’s field’s view down not far above the horizon? Point your camera at them, with the parking lot in the lower part of the frame and take a picture. Now, look at your picture. Do you see the planets? — Nope. Why? Because the camera didn’t have time to gather enough light to collect enough light to capture an image (although, with superior equipment, there may be the faintest of a smudge of one or more of the planets, right at the edge of visibility). Now, walk off the parking lot to a really dark place, aim the camera at the planets, and set your shutter speed for them (assuming your camera has a shutter speed that slow — and that you either can hold the camera rock-steady or have a tripod on which to mount it). Now, snap a shot and look at it. Bingo! There the planets are. But without changing the settings, walk back to the same spot on the parking lot and take yet a third shot, this one the same as the first one you took. Look at the photo — completely washed out. You don’t have to have a PhD in optical physics to grasp the concept.
Finally, the shadows. They are not inconsistent. Ever hear of reflection? Ever hear of parallax? Well, look ‘em up. By the way, in the RAINBOWS in the upper left corner of the photo? OMG!!! There’s no AIR on the Moon!!! That PROVES the photos were FAKED in Hollywood!!!
Ummmm — ever play with a prism when you were in third grade? A natural rainbow is formed by diffraction through water droplets in the atmosphere. An unnatural one is formed by lens aberration, where a defect or poor-quality part of the lens.
Now, was I THERE? Of course not, but even if I were Neil Armstrong or Buzz Aldrin, you probably wouldn’t believe me.
But using the probability of who’s likely correct, hundreds of thousands of scientists or a handful of deniers, virtually none of whom, if any, are trained in any science — I think I’ll stick with the pros. Think of it this way: if I’m having a really bad headache for weeks and weeks then go to a dozen doctors and they all tell me I have a brain tumor and need surgery ASAP, but my neighbor, a professor in biochemistry tells me they’re wrong and I really have a chemical imbalance in my blood and all I need to do is eat a bunch of garlic every day for a week — who do you think I’m going to choose to believe?
Maybe I’m wrong in where I place my faith and the Earth really *is* flat, and the *earth is the center of the Universe, and the stars are holes in Heaven through which light from outside shines through, and so on.
I don’t think so, though.
Mekhung kurt@ your concept of momentum is completely wrong. You can’t apply it to airless space
WHO SAW IN THE 1TH PIC ON THE MOON THERE WAS A BALL AND A SV TAR THE BALL IS THE MOON ITSELF BECAUSE U CANT SEE THIS STAR UNLESS FROM EARTH